arXiv (All)
open access
Assay: Claims That Decay With the Code. Content-Addressed Evidence Graphs for Accountable AI-Assisted Software Delivery
AI coding agents fail in two coupled ways. They spend most of their context window rediscovering where things live, and they assert success without evidence when the work gets hard. Repository indexes address the first with cheap context, and orchestration frameworks with adversarial review address
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Assay: Claims That Decay With the Code. Content-Addressed Evidence Graphs for Accountable AI-Assisted Software Delivery#1122380
- A Methodology for Investigating AI Patterns Prevalence in Software Repositories#329161
- (Don't) Trust, but (Don't) Verify: Developers' Attention to Security in AI-Generated Code#1034990
- (Don't) Trust, but (Don't) Verify: Developers' Attention to Security in AI-Generated Code#1006807
- Observing the Conduct of Systematic Reviews with Generative AI Support: An Experience Report from a Graduate Software Engineering Course#1061962
Record · ID 1131012
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive