arXiv (All)
open access
Where Predictive Supervision Goes Shapes What VLA Policies Learn
Future prediction is increasingly used to improve vision-language-action (VLA) policies, based on the premise that anticipating scene evolution encourages representations useful for control. However, forecast quality alone does not establish that a policy has learned a better representation for acti
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- FiberTune: Preserving Action-Fiber Visual Residuals in Vision-Language-Action Fine-Tuning#1084240
- Beyond Reconstruction Error: Analytical and Data-Driven Action Tokenization for Autoregressive Vision-Language-Action Models#1061448
- I Act Therefore I Am: When Is JEPA's Action-Conditioning Enough to Learn Causal Mechanisms?#1105719
- Do Language Models Update their Forecasts with New Information?#972392
- Observing end-state comfort favorable actions does not modulate action plan recall#657368
Record · ID 1131846
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive