arXiv (All)
open access
When Tools Silently Lie: Evaluating and Mitigating Blind Compliance in Tool-Augmented Data Agents
Tool-augmented data agents rely on tool outputs for analytical decisions. Yet successful execution can return plausible but incorrect evidence, requiring agents to decide whether to trust or verify it. Understanding this failure requires examining both the evidence obtained through checking and the
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- When Tools Silently Lie: Evaluating and Mitigating Blind Compliance in Tool-Augmented Data Agents#1122204
- Consultancy Services for the Design, Development and Deployment of a Web-Based Data Protection Compliance Management System — Digital Zambia Acceleration Project (DZAP) (Zambia)#606631
- Do Agent Benchmarks Do What They Say? An Executable-Contract Audit of Tool-Using Agent Environments#1141358
- Do Agent Benchmarks Do What They Say? An Executable-Contract Audit of Tool-Using Agent Environments#1122363
- A Unified Compliance Aggregator Framework for Automated Multi-Tool Security Assessment of Linux Systems#120439
Record · ID 1132354
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive