arXiv CS
open access
Alignment via Training Against Probes Without Losing Monitorability
Models are usually aligned based on their observed outputs, using demonstrations, preference data, or reward signals. These objectives reward responses that look aligned. More capable models may learn to satisfy them without internalizing the intended behavior, for example by faking compliance durin
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Alignment via Training Against Probes Without Losing Monitorability#1143246
- Just Ask Jev: Reinforcement Learning for Calibrated Decisions as a Zero-Shot Detector of AI Alignment Failures#1077358
- Contemporary AI Alignment methodologies and constraints - literature review#696739
- The Epistemic Limits of Machine Alignment: Preference Aggregation, Constitutional Design, and the Question of Artificial Subjectivity#689886
- Distortion of AI Alignment Revisited: RLHF is a Decent Utilitarian Aligner#1070137
Record · ID 1136796
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive