ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Left Atrial Ablation With Permanent Pacemaker or ImplanTable Loop Recorder Follow-UP
The purpose of this study is 3 fold:- 1. To compare the efficacy and complication rates of 2 widely used methods, conventional irrigation tip ablation catheter (LASSO) and Ablation Frontiers ablation technology, of AF ablation for PAF. 2. To evaluate the Reveal XT ILR as a long term accurate AF monitoring device as compared to the 'gold standard' DDD pacemaker Holter. 3. To accurately evaluate, by continuous rhythm monitoring for 1 year, the efficacy of AF ablation therapy for PAF.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Randomized Evaluation of Redo Ablation Procedures of Atrial Fibrillation With FIRM Guided Procedures#1151486
- Full Length Versus Proximal Renal Arteries Ablation#1102029
- Clinical Evaluation on Advanced Resynchronization#832140
- Safety And FEasibility of a Simplified Deep Sedation Protocol for Pulsed-Field Ablation#829084
- Implantable Loop Recorder in Hemodialysis Patients#852592
Record · ID 1139408
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive