ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Comparison of Lithotripsy Urolithiasis Machines
A comparison on the outcomes of patients undergoing shockwave lithotripsy using the Storz machine versus the Dornier machine.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- A Study to Investigate the Effect of Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy on Hypertension#329419
- PMCF Investigation of MODULITH® SLX-F2 With StorM-Track in Patients With Kidney Stones#883788
- Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation for Pain Relief During Extracorporeal Shock-wave Lithotripsy#848760
- Assessing the quality and readability of patient information available for shockwave lithotripsy: Human versus artificial intelligence comparison of resources and quality measurements - A benchmarking study from European association of urology (EAU) endourology.#434159
- Electrohydraulic Versus Laser Lithotripsy for Treatment of Difficult to Remove Biliary Stones#844484
Record · ID 1140390
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive