NCBI PubMed Central
open access
Assessing the quality and readability of patient information available for shockwave lithotripsy: Human versus artificial intelligence comparison of resources and quality measurements - A benchmarking study from European association of urology (EAU) endourology.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Comparison of Lithotripsy Urolithiasis Machines#1140390
- Evaluating the quality, understandability, actionability, and readability of ChatGPT-generated patient information on overactive bladder: A cross-sectional study.#388627
- Outcome of Renal Transplant on a Defunctionalized Bladder#902842
- Precision Management of Urinary Tract Symptoms in Older Women#1138710
- Scanadu Urine Device Validation Study Protocol#872135
Record · ID 434159
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive