arXiv (All)
open access
Regime Boundary Alignment for Evidence-Gated Question Answering
Retrieval-augmented language models are expected to answer from the retrieved evidence, but in practice they often keep answering when that evidence is missing. We trace this behavior to the training signal: answer-focused fine-tuning assigns no target to unsupported contexts, so it cannot distingui
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Predicting the Benefit of Retrieval Augmentation in Open-Domain Question Answering#635801
- Predicting the Benefit of Retrieval Augmentation in Open-Domain Question Answering#633452
- Beyond One-Shot Expansion: Contrastive Evidence Exploration for Multi-Hop Retrieval#975116
- Intrinsic Sequence-Likelihood Confidence in Retrieval-Dominated Extractive QA: Two Pre-Specified Negatives, and What They Do and Do Not Attribute#1014987
- How Do LLMs Cite? A Mechanistic Interpretation of Attribution in Retrieval-Augmented Generation#1048329
Record · ID 1141813
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive