arXiv (All)
open access
Intrinsic Sequence-Likelihood Confidence in Retrieval-Dominated Extractive QA: Two Pre-Specified Negatives, and What They Do and Do Not Attribute
In extractive document question answering whose questions were generated from the passages that contain their answers -- so that retrieval recovers 92-99.8% of what any mode combination could reach, whatever its absolute accuracy -- confidence-driven mechanisms have little to gain. Fine-tuning an op
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- CiteGuard-RAG: A Validation-Centered AI System for Evidence-Grounded Question Answering#1109870
- Regime Boundary Alignment for Evidence-Gated Question Answering#1141813
- Augmenting Interviewer Judgments of Patient Experience with Automatic Language Analysis#819040
- Augmenting Interviewer Judgments of Patient Experience with Automatic Language Analysis#809048
- Learning Evidence Sufficiency Boundaries for Selective Answering in Grounded Multi-Hop QA#822120
Record · ID 1014987
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive