arXiv (All)
open access
On the Reliability of User-Centric Evaluation of Conversational Recommender Systems
User-centric evaluation has become a key paradigm for assessing Conversational Recommender Systems (CRS), aiming to capture subjective qualities such as satisfaction, trust, and rapport. To enable scalable evaluation, recent work increasingly relies on third-party annotations of static dialogue logs
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Beyond Fluency: A Human-Centered Evaluation Rubric for Grounding, Answerability, and Reliability in LLM Outputs#118367
- Data Processing for Offline Evaluation in Recommender Systems: a Survey#1115652
- Towards Effective Structured Context Modeling for Conversational Recommender Systems via Dual-node Monte Carlo Tree Search#822038
- The Lifecycle of LLM-as-a-Judge for Large-Scale Recommendation Explanations#819452
- The Lifecycle of LLM-as-a-Judge for Large-Scale Recommendation Explanations#809456
Record · ID 1143689
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive