arXiv (All)
open access
Search Shapes Conclusions: Auditing Evidence Selection Bias in Deep Research Agents
Deep Research agents synthesize evidence into cited reports, yet a well-cited report can still reach a misleading conclusion. Citation correctness checks whether cited sources support individual claims. It does not show whether adaptive search exposed a representative view of all documents made avai
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Beyond the Gatekeeper: A Framework for AI-Assisted Open Peer Review and Decentralized Scientific Evaluation#691781
- Evidence-Gated Research: Statistically Controlled Model Adoption in Adaptive Search#1157022
- A Systematic Multi-Domain Evaluation of Document Retrievers#1077384
- Citation-Grounded Historical Phrase Profiles for Reviewer Agreement Forecasting#695631
- GroundedGEO: Auditing the Evidence Gap in Generative Search Rankings#1051682
Record · ID 1143993
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive