arXiv (All)
open access
Structure vs. Chain-of-Thought: Evaluating LLM Criteria Extraction for Depression Severity
A large language model (LLM) can rate depression severity directly from a social media post or mark which clinical criteria the post shows and let code turn the count into a label. The latter is easier to audit because a clinician can check each marked criterion. We compare these approaches on two R
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Reliability, validity, and diagnostic evidence for multi-model LLM short-answer scoring#973898
- Beyond Judgment: Exploring Large Language Models as Non-Judgmental Support for Maternal Mental Health#1130508
- A method for identifying predictive markers of mental illness in social media data#468134
- SeMiLLa: An R Package and Shiny App for LLM-Assisted Construction and Pre-Empirical Semantic Screening of Psychometric Scales#276678
- Bag of Tricks or Bag of Myths? Reducing Modeling Complexity with Task Knowledge in Explainable Suicide Risk Assessment#984664
Record · ID 1144016
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive