arXiv (All)
open access
Reliability, validity, and diagnostic evidence for multi-model LLM short-answer scoring
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used or proposed for educational scoring, but single-model and single-run evaluations provide limited evidence for assessment use. Short-answer scoring requires evidence about reliability, validity, severity, diagnostic value, and failure cases. This stu
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Structure vs. Chain-of-Thought: Evaluating LLM Criteria Extraction for Depression Severity#1144016
- The use and methodological reporting of large language models in qualitative research: a scoping review.#284871
- Can LLMs Reason Over Long Horizons? An Empirical Evaluation of Context Strategies for Longitudinal Clinical Reasoning#1155497
- Self-reported archetypes and behavioral failures in Large Language Models#1110396
- Evaluating Open-Weight Large Language Models for Structured Depression Assessment from Clinical Interviews#29838
Record · ID 973898
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive