arXiv (All)
open access
Self-Spec Verifiable Code Generation
Large language models (LLMs) may generate unreliable code on corner cases missed by testing, while formal verification can provide machine-checkable guarantees. Recently, researchers have proposed several benchmarks to evaluate the capabilities of LLMs in generating formally verifiable code, where L
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Self-Spec Verifiable Code Generation#1169639
- Detecting Inconsistencies in Model Specifications with LLM-as-Verifier Reasoning#1169612
- Detecting Inconsistencies in Model Specifications with LLM-as-Verifier Reasoning#1157118
- From If-Statements to ML Pipelines: Revisiting Bias in Code-Generation#126582
- Beyond Static Guarantees: Measuring the Static-Pass Dynamic-Fail Gap in Security-Sensitive and LLM-Generated Python Code#673433
Record · ID 1144535
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive