CanLII
metadata only
R. v. E.C.
Decided: 2026-09-24. Docket: COA-CR-0722. Citation: 2026 ONCA 669 (CanLII). Criminal and statutory offences — Appeals — Jury charge — Sexual assault and assault convictions — Appellate review of jury instructions read as a whole, R. v. Abdullahi — Whether jury was properly equipped to decide according to law and evidence — Misdirection on fabrication instruction in relation to complainant — Appeal allowed and new trial ordered | Evidence — Jury instructions — Fabrication — Whether fabrication instruction may be given about complainant’s evidence — “Independent evidence” requirement applies to accused’s fabricated statement, R. v. U.K., R. v. Coutts — Risk of confusing burden of proof and reasonable doubt — Instruction could have impacted verdict — New trial ordered | Evidence — Jury instru
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- R. v. Isaac#824290
- Marlin c. R.#824293
- Warren Court Incrementalism and Indigent Criminal Appellants’ Right to Trial Transcripts#277786
- 18 U.S.C. § 2237 — Criminal sanctions for failure to heave to, obstruction of boarding, or providing false information#573747
- 17 U.S.C. § 1504 — Nature of proceedings#572985
Record · ID 1146876
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive