OSF
open access
Decomposing attentional differences between willingness-to-pay and choice: Evidence from gaze and computational modeling
Different preference-elicitation formats can induce different attentional patterns and yield conflicting apparent preference orders for the same options; a classic example is preference reversals between choice and willingness-to-pay (WTP) judgments. Reversals may be attributed to multiple different
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Decomposing attentional differences between willingness-to-pay and choice: Evidence from gaze and computational modeling#1148227
- Visual Harmony and Complexity Shape Subjective Judgments More than Detectable Overt Attention: Evidence from Eye-Tracking and Facial Coding.#1080512
- Beyond Scalar Choice: Foraging as a Policy Framework for Decision Neuroscience#1054841
- Beyond Scalar Choice: Foraging as a Policy Framework for Decision Neuroscience#1040281
- Computational determinants of context-dependent preferences in probabilistic tasks.#178357
Record · ID 1148307
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive