OSF
open access
No Deals in the Pipeline: The Use of Precedent Agreements to Demonstrate Demand for New Natural Gas Infrastructure After Environmental Defense Fund v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
This Note examines the D.C. Circuit’s decision in Environmental Defense Fund v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and argues that the court correctly rejected the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission’s reliance on a single precedent agreement between affiliated entities as sufficient evidence of
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- 7 U.S.C. § 8355 — Losses of livestock due to depredation by federally protected species#559908
- 33 U.S.C. § 702j — Projects relating to tributary streams; report to Congress; appropriation#585998
- 7 U.S.C. § 950cc-1 — Environmental reviews#561889
- 7 U.S.C. § 1738f — Environmental framework agreements#561485
- Colville Lake Renewable Resources Council v Northwest Territories (Minister of Environment and Natural Resources)#638572
Record · ID 1148357
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive