ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Comparison of Surgical Site Infection Rate Between Primary, Delayed Primary and Vacuum Assisted Closures.
The objective of the study is to compare infection rates between primary, delayed primary and vacuum assisted closures in contaminated and dirty/infected laparotomy wounds.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Outcome of Primary vs Delayed Primary Closure of Laparotomy in Dirty Abdominal Wounds#883453
- Comparison of Interrupted Suturing Versus Continuous Suturing in Laparotomy Wound Closed.#825997
- Diluted Aqueous Povidone-Iodine Compared to Saline to Decrease Surgical Site Infections#1030730
- Comparing Wound Complications After Elective Abdominal Surgery Using Two Closure Techniques#1075176
- Affixing Polypropylene Mesh Using Barbed Suture (Quill™ Srs) During Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy Randomized Controlled Trial (Quill Lsc)#898775
Record · ID 1151491
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive