ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Comparison of Interrupted Suturing Versus Continuous Suturing in Laparotomy Wound Closed.
Emergency laparotomy is associated with high morbidity, particularly due to wound dehiscence and infection. Choosing an optimal suturing technique can significantly impact patient outcomes, but data on the comparison of interrupted suturing with continuous suturing in emergency settings is limited. Therefore, the current study was planned, aiming to compare the outcome of emergency laparotomy wounds closed by interrupted suturing versus continuous suturing.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Comparison of Surgical Site Infection Rate Between Primary, Delayed Primary and Vacuum Assisted Closures.#1151491
- No Closure vs Interrupted vs Continuous Subcutaneous Closure: Operative Time and Wound Outcomes#837151
- Comparative Study - Transseptal Suture Technique Verses Anterior Nasal Packing After Septoplasty#1140970
- Scar Tissue Analysis After Intraoperative Application of Stromal Vascular Fraction Cells Into Suture Line#911085
- Comparing Wound Complications After Elective Abdominal Surgery Using Two Closure Techniques#1075176
Record · ID 825997
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive