PhilArchive
open access
Consequentialism, Constraints, and Good-Relative-to
Recently, it has been a part of the so-called consequentializing project to attempt to construct versions of consequentialism that can support agent-relative moral constraints. Mark Schroeder has argued that such views are bound to fail because they cannot make sense of the agent relative value on which they need to rely. In this paper, I provide a fitting-attitude account of both agent-relative and agent-neutral values that can together be used to consequentialize agent-relative constraints.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Setiya on Consequentialism and Constraints#712550
- Consequentializing agent‐centered restrictions: A Kantsequentialist approach#761368
- Does Moral Virtue Constitute a Benefit to the Agent?#740509
- PETER SINGER'S UTILITARIANISM AND THE PHILOSOPHY OF VIRTUES: Two Grammars of The Good, A Criterion-Fixed Structural Adjudication#715128
- LLM-as-Code Agentic Programming for Agent Harness#282880
Record · ID 115278
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive