arXiv (All)
open access
"very likely" Means "uncertain"? How LLMs Diverge from Humans in Linguistic Uncertainty Quantification
Humans express uncertainty verbally via markers (e.g., "possible," "likely"), yet most LLM uncertainty quantification (UQ) relies on costing likelihood- or consistency-based signals. From a cognitive perspective, accurate verbal uncertainty reflects metacognitive monitoring, representing knowledge b
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- LLMs learn different forms of metacognition when trained to predict their own accuracy#1118959
- When Linguistic and Internal Confidence Diverge in Large Language Models#927455
- The Error Theory of LLM Consciousness: There is No Evidence that Standard LLMs are Conscious#83497
- Estimating Uncertainty from Reasoning: A Large-Scale Study of Multi- and Crosslingual MCQA Performance in LLMs#346560
- Verbalized and Internal Probabilities Are Coupled in Large Language Models#1155762
Record · ID 1154706
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive