arXiv (All)
open access
Adaptive and oblivious statistical adversaries are equivalent
We resolve a fundamental question about the ability to perform a statistical task, such as learning, when an adversary corrupts the sample. Such adversaries are specified by the types of corruption they can make and their level of knowledge about the sample. The latter distinguishes between sample-a
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Debunking, Epistemic Achievement, and Undermining Defeat#745246
- Keyless secrecy against bounded adversaries#1000211
- The Art of the Probable: Literature and Probability#67132
- Randomness Is Unpredictability#725122
- When Does Randomized Oversight Align AI Agents That Can Conceal?#1142863
Record · ID 1155022
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive