arXiv (All)
open access
LLM assisted writing deserves empirical evaluation
LLM-assisted writing is often treated as a detection problem, as it raises questions about clarity, integrity, equity, and evaluation. An analysis of 69,209 Health Informatics papers links it to more focused presentation, broader citation practices, and more globally distributed authorship. These pa
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Democratizing Scientific Publishing: A Local, Multi-Agent LLM Framework for Objective Manuscript Editing#183345
- More Than Mimicking Reviewers: Evaluating LLMs for Pre-Submission Peer Review#973418
- Using LLM-generated tools to extract information about reporting statistical software in biomedical and health science research articles.#360902
- Frontier Lag: A Bibliometric Audit of Capability Misrepresentation in Academic AI Evaluation#1077886
- From Citations to Contributions: LLM-Assisted Credit Scoring of Research Articles#984580
Record · ID 1155295
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive