arXiv (All)
open access
Groundability, Not Scale Alone: When Weak Reviewers Can Audit Strong Coding Agents
Coding agents can return plausible patches that omit required behavior. These failures are hard to review because long traces and confident summaries often hide what was missed. We ask when a nominally weaker reviewer can reliably decide whether a patch solves its issue. We study 411 execution-label
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Groundability, Not Scale Alone: When Weak Reviewers Can Audit Strong Coding Agents#1169623
- ReproRepo: Scaling Reproducibility Audits with GitHub Repository Issues#820515
- Probe-and-Refine Tuning of Repository Guidance for Coding Agents#290565
- VST: Verifiable Structured Transport for Auditable Agent-to-Agent Alpha Discovery#975129
- MERIT: Matching Expertise via Rubric-Informed Training for Reviewer Assignment#998239
Record · ID 1155958
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive