arXiv (All)
open access
Does Scaling Reinforcement Learning Really Require More Training?
Scaling reasoning typically spends more compute on reinforcement learning (RL) or on inference. We show that a completed RL training history can yield policies stronger than the checkpoints visited by its optimizer. We call this policy-space scaling: expanding the deployable policy set accessible fr
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Mitigating the Length-Scaling Tax with Online Distillation#1143455
- Finetuning with Sampling: SFT Learns Better Than You Think#1161030
- Finetuning with Sampling: SFT Learns Better Than You Think#1157488
- Unlearnable, or Unmeasured? On the Reliability of Difficulty Labels in RLVR#1154382
- Unlearnable, or Unmeasured? On the Reliability of Difficulty Labels in RLVR#1136873
Record · ID 1156068
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive