arXiv (All)
open access
The Benchmarking Epistemology: Validity Theory for Evaluating Machine Learning Models
Predictive benchmarking, evaluating machine learning models based on predictive performance and competitive ranking, is central to machine learning research and scientific inquiry. However, benchmark scores at best measure performance relative to a specific dataset and learning problem. Drawing subs
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- One Capability or Many? Testing the Economic Validity of Frontier AI Evaluation#794210
- One Capability or Many? Testing the Economic Validity of Frontier AI Evaluation#790191
- Agent Evaluation Reliability: More Tasks Won't (Always) Fix An Agent Leaderboard#1155586
- Beyond reliability: towards a broader epistemic evaluation of citizen science#716107
- Fair synthetic data is not about fairness#690761
Record · ID 1156222
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive