arXiv (All)
open access
High Volatility and Action Bias Distinguish LLMs from Humans in Group Coordination
Humans exhibit remarkable abilities to coordinate in groups. As large language models (LLMs) become more capable, it remains an open question whether they can demonstrate comparable adaptive coordination and whether they use the same strategies as humans. To better understand this, we compare LLM an
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Who Wins the Conflict? Mechanistic Interpretability of Text Bias in Audio LLMs#927351
- Cheap Talk Stabilizes Strategic Interaction in LLM Agents#1110639
- From Solo to Social Learning: Characterizing Recursive Social Improvement in LLMs#1143117
- CHARM: Character Hallucination for Multicultural Role Play Benchmark#821293
- Relative Generalization Invariance of LLM Pretraining#1117728
Record · ID 1156319
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive