arXiv (All)
open access
Old Ideas, Novel Problems: The Instability of LLM-Based Novelty Evaluation
Automated ideation systems are often evaluated on the novelty of the ideas they produce, and that judgment is increasingly delegated to large language models. Such judges are typically built ad hoc and validated, if at all, on human-authored papers rather than on the generated ideas they are meant t
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- LDC: Learning to Generate Research Idea with Dynamic Control#925031
- LDC: Learning to Generate Research Idea with Dynamic Control#920797
- Exploration of Intrinsic Relevance Judgments by Legal Professionals in Information Retrieval Systems#279135
- Ideation Arena: Evaluating LLM Generated Research Ideas with Battle-style Human Expert Assessment#798331
- Ideation Arena: Evaluating LLM Generated Research Ideas with Battle-style Human Expert Assessment#796918
Record · ID 1157370
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive