PhilArchive
open access
The Minimal Overlap Rule: Restrictions on Mergers for Creditors' Consensus
As it is known, there is no rule satisfying Additivity in the complete domain of bankruptcy problems. This paper proposes a notion of partial Additivity in this context, to be called µ-additivity. We find that µ-additivity, together with two quite compelling axioms, anonymity and continuity, identify the Minimal Overlap rule, introduced by Neill (1982).
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The Q-Theory of Mergers#942730
- Evaluation of Due Diligence Phase In Mergers and Acquisitions In İne with Data Protection Law#1176928
- An Equilibrium Approach to International Merger Policy#942236
- Accounting for the Rise in Consumer Bankruptcies#21695
- A Legal Theory of Shareholder Primacy#269919
Record · ID 115829
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive