OSF
open access
Questions about Generative Language Models for Human Resources Decision Making
In this chapter, we discuss the gaps in the current understanding of how generative large language models (LLMs) make person judgments. Person judgments refer to inferences about someone's standing on a psychological construct, particularly when the judgment is made under uncertainty. We extend this
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Accuracy of Training Data and Model Outputs in Generative AI: CREATe Response to the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) Consultation#818474
- Pinocchio: Fast Uncertainty Estimates for Black-Box Language Models#1062665
- Pinocchio: Fast Uncertainty Estimates for Black-Box Language Models#1028739
- Cross-Entropy Risk Estimation for Language Models: Inconsistency Must Be Dense, and the Holdout Method Is No Exception#616936
- Cross-Entropy Risk Estimation for Language Models: Inconsistency Must Be Dense, and the Holdout Method Is No Exception#616436
Record · ID 1159790
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive