PhilArchive
open access
Implicit Bias, Stereotype Threat, and Political Correctness in Philosophy
This paper offers an unorthodox appraisal of empirical research bearing on the question of the low representation of women in philosophy. It contends that fashionable views in the profession concerning implicit bias and stereotype threat are weakly supported, that philosophers often fail to report the empirical work responsibly, and that the standards for evidence are set very low—so long as you take a certain viewpoint.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Cisgender Commonsense and Philosophy's Transgender Trouble#719356
- Escape from Philosophy: a Rejoinder to the Thom Brooks Reply#748067
- Subject-Contextualism and the Meaning of Gender Terms#778775
- You Think You Know Someone: Trans Identities and Epistemic Injustice#724585
- Androcentrismo e binarismo: sfide e prospettive per l’inclusione di genere nella lingua italiana#80926
Record · ID 116140
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive