PhilArchive
open access
Escape from Philosophy: a Rejoinder to the Thom Brooks Reply
The reply begins by stating that responses to reviews of EfL are “taking criticism of their philosophical claims as personal attacks” and resorting to “hysterical ad hominems”. On the contrary, the responses to around fourteen—often highly positive—reviews have welcomed all their criticisms and simply replied to them. None of these replies appear to commit the ad hominem (to the man) fallacy: that of addressing the qualities of a person as a way of attempting to undermine or defend an argument or assertion made by that person.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- ◉ Labels Are Not Arguments: Credence, Identity, and the Misclassification of Rational Agents#726703
- Implicit Bias, Stereotype Threat, and Political Correctness in Philosophy#116140
- Responses to criticisms#695106
- On the Epistemic Value of Reflection#81886
- Philosophical Argumentation, Epistemic Injustice, and Recognition#691411
Record · ID 748067
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive