ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
A Multi-site Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Regional and General Anesthesia for Effects on Neurodevelopmental Outcome and Apnea in Infants
The primary purpose of the GAS study is to determine whether different types of anesthesia (Regional versus General) given to 720 infants undergoing inguinal hernia repair results in equivalent neurodevelopmental outcomes. The study also aims to describe the incidence of apnea in the post-operative period after both regional and general anesthesia for inguinal hernia repair in infants. This study is important as it will provide the greatest evidence for safety or toxicity of general anesthesia for human infants.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Anesthetics and Analgesics in Children#1007448
- Lidocaine Infusion for Major Abdominal Pediatric Surgery#1101226
- Dexmedetomidine Sedation Versus General Anaesthesia for Inguinal Hernia Surgery in Infants#864007
- Exposure to General Anaesthesia in Infancy and Neurocognitive Development#892682
- Spinal Anesthesia and General Anesthesia for Pyloromyotomy - Surgical Outcomes a Comparison Retrospective Study#826274
Record · ID 1162238
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive