ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Dexmedetomidine Sedation Versus General Anaesthesia for Inguinal Hernia Surgery in Infants
This is a prospective randomized controlled trial comparing dexmedetomidine sedation with caudal anaesthesia, and general sevoflurane anaesthesia with caudal anaesthesia for inguinal herniotomies in neonates and infants below 3 months of age. The investigators will compare the efficacy and adverse events associated with each of these techniques and neurodevelopmental outcomes of the infants in each group at 6 months and 2 years of age.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- A Multi-site Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Regional and General Anesthesia for Effects on Neurodevelopmental Outcome and Apnea in Infants#1162238
- Spinal Or General Anesthesia For Umblical Hernia Surgery#807359
- Spinal Anaesthesia for Caesarean Section: Descriptive Multicentre Study#806300
- Intrathecal Midazolam, Fentanyl and Nalbuphine as Adjuvants to Bupivacaine in Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Section#1074314
- Bupivacaine 5 mg vs 7.5 mg for Spinal Anesthesia in Cesarean Delivery in Indonesian Population#803451
Record · ID 864007
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive