PsyArXiv
metadata only
Item-dropping to improve in-sample Cronbach's alpha can harm true reliability: A Monte Carlo simulation
Cronbach's alpha is the most commonly reported metric of reliability in psychological measurement, and statistical software encourages a common post hoc revision: dropping the item whose removal most improves in-sample alpha. A Monte Carlo simulation examined what this practice does to true reliabil
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Item-dropping to improve in-sample Cronbach's alpha can harm true reliability: A Monte Carlo simulation#423333
- Enhancing Measurement Precision of Patient-Reported Outcomes Using Item Response Theory.#14823
- Fostering teenagers' assessment of information reliability: Effects of a classroom intervention focused on critical source dimensions#268477
- Confidence#134
- Self-Cleaning and Captured Anyway: One Measured Primitive for Error in a Store an Agent Writes to Itself, and What a Falling Score Actually Measures#1051545
Record · ID 1167842
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive