PhilArchive
open access
Subjunctive Tu quoque Arguments. Commentary on Anderson, Aikin & Casey
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The Politics of Legal Form: An Essay on Subjunctive Jurisprudence#1108066
- The possibility of judgment aggregation on agendas with subjunctive implications#720348
- Style: should Kripke have avoided “I” in his academic writing?#86883
- K. Brad Wray: _Interpreting Kuhn: Critical Essays_#765242
- Indirect Discourse: Parataxis, the Propositional Function Modification, and “That”#743098
Record · ID 116825
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive