PhilArchive
open access
Style: should Kripke have avoided “I” in his academic writing?
This brief paper considers what to say about someone who responds to Saul Kripke’s writing by saying, “He uses ‘I’. That sounds subjective.” What to say about such an inference?! The main response I offer is that philosophy is partly about challenging, not encouraging, mistaken inferences.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Kratzerian 'want', decision theory, and upward entailment#83369
- Comments on Saul Kripke’s A Puzzle about Time and Thought#111257
- Minimal Disagreement#778770
- Subjunctive Tu quoque Arguments. Commentary on Anderson, Aikin & Casey#116825
- Semantic dispositionalism and non-inferential knowledge#738138
Record · ID 86883
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive