Europe PMC
open access
CC BY 4.0
All-Arthroscopic Versus Mini-Open Single-Row Repair of Full-Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears: A Prospective Comparative Study
Abstract Background Evidence directly comparing all-arthroscopic and mini-open repair while holding the repair configuration constant is limited. This study compared functional outcomes, pain, shoulder range of motion, and postoperative complications following all-arthroscopic an
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Osteopathic Manual Treatment for Hemiplegic Shoulder Pain and Upper Extremity Function in Stroke Patients#835982
- Effects of Interscalene Block on Visual Clarity in Arthroscopic Surgery#471543
- Real-time Interactive Digital Healthcare System in Patients With Breast Cancer; Randomized Controlled Trial#848538
- Total Arch Replacement With Frozen Elephant Trunk Versus Hemiarch Replacement in the Management of Acute Type A Aortic Dissection#898859
- Comparison of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Spinopelvic Fixation for Unstable Sacral Fractures#865707
Record · ID 1175119
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive