OpenAlex
metadata only
Artificial Intelligence: problems of civil law qualification
Following the methodology of civil research, the concept of artificial intelligence is analyzed and the conclusion about the fallacy of recognizing the legal personality of artificial intelligence is argued. Artificial intelligence as a result of complicated programming is a complex object of civil
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- A General Overview of Artificial Intelligence and Its Current Implications in Civil Law#1176667
- Essay on the use of the concept of legal fact by AI/ALGORITHM/S technology#1177931
- Civil Law Responsibility in Artificial Intelligence-Driven Decision Making#1176525
- Automated Justice: Issues, Benefits and Risks in the Use of Artificial Intelligence and Its Algorithms in Access to Justice and Law Enforcement#964454
- ISSUES OF INTEGRATING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE INTO CIVIL JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS: PROCEDURAL GUARANTEES AND PROSPECTS#229966
Record · ID 1176413
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive