OpenAlex
metadata only
CC BY 4.0
An Adaptive Conceptualisation of Artificial Intelligence and the Law, Regulation and Ethics
The description of a combination of technologies as ‘artificial intelligence’ (AI) is misleading. To ascribe intelligence to a statistical model without human attribution points towards an attempt at shifting legal, social, and ethical responsibilities to machines. This paper exposes the deeply flaw
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The ethics of disclosing the use of artificial intelligence tools in writing scholarly manuscripts#686405
- Research Ethics and Data Privacy#400619
- Bridging the accountability gap of artificial intelligence – what can be learned from Roman law?#964300
- The AGI Gamble： Certain Sacrifice, Uncertain Annihilation#693709
- THE UNARMED CODER: THE STRUCTURAL BLINDNESS OF ETHICS IN AI#732092
Record · ID 1176624
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive