ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
A Comparison of Monosyn and Monocryl Sutures in Surgical Wounds
To better understand surgeon preference when using synthetic, absorbable, monofilament suture by comparing two similar appearing FDA-approved sutures, Monosyn (Aesculap) and Monocryl (Ethicon).
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Influence of Suture Type on Emergency Midline Laparotomy Closure#1170492
- Evaluating the Need for Transosseous Anchoring in Anterolateral Hip Prosthetic Surgery#993669
- Interrupted Oblique Intradermal Suture Versus Conventional Interrupted Intradermal Suture#1363870
- Comparison of Cyanoacrylate Tissue Adhesive With Suture in the Treatment of Gingival Recession#862857
- Comparing the Effectiveness of Cyanoacrylate Tissue Adhesives and Conventional Sutures#885361
Record · ID 1182430
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive