ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Interrupted Oblique Intradermal Suture Versus Conventional Interrupted Intradermal Suture
This study was conducted to demonstrate the equivalence of wound outcomes between the interrupted oblique intradermal suture (OIS) and conventional interrupted intradermal suture (IS) methods
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- A Comparison of Monosyn and Monocryl Sutures in Surgical Wounds#1182430
- Nonabsorbable Versus Absorbable Sutures for Anterior Colporrhaphy#810721
- Management of Complex Wounds Using a Constant Tension External Tissue Expander#1261946
- Interrupted Subdermal Suture Spacing During Linear Wound Closures and the Effect on Wound Cosmesis#1032360
- Mass Continous Suture With PDS Versus Interrupted Suture With Thread on Major Abdominal Incision#1229401
Record · ID 1363870
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive