ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
A Prospective Observational Study Comparing Computer-Assisted Paramedian Approach Versus Conventional Midline Approach for Lumbar Puncture
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the effects of CMPAT and MAT in patients undergoing LP. Participants will be randomly assigned to either the CMPAT treatment group (group A) or the MAT treatment group (group B). Researchers will compare CMPAT treatment group and the MAT treatment group to see if the number of needle insertion attempts required for a successful LP, the puncture success rate, pain assessment in the back, head, and legs, and the occurrence of complications have different.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Vapocoolant Spray for Reducing the Pain of Spinal Needle Insertion#1194909
- A Biomechanical Study of the Lumbar Intervertebral Disc by Lever Positioning Manipulation#913210
- Effectiveness of Exercise Therapy Versus Spinal Manual Therapy in Patients With PFPS#1073053
- Two Different Approaches During Fluoroscopically Guided Interlaminar Lumbar Epidural Steroid Injection#883502
- Effect of Decompression With and Without ELDOA in Lumber Disc Protrusion Patients#1137468
Record · ID 1182750
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive