ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
3D-printed Crowns Versus Zirconia Crowns for Primary Molars
The aim of the present study is to compare between 3D-printed crowns and prefabricated zirconia crowns for restoring pulpally-treated primary molars regarding the following aspects: 1. In vivo: Evaluate the clinical outcome of 3D printed crowns in comparison to prefabricated zirconia crowns in pulpally-treated primary molars as well as parent satisfaction. 2. In vitro: Comparative analysis of fracture resistance and marginal gap of 3D printed crowns and prefabricated zirconia crowns
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Assessment of Clinical Success of Custom-Made Versus Prefabricated Zirconia Crowns in Pulpotomized Primary Molars#993035
- 3D-printed Endocrowns Versus Prefabricated Zirconia Crowns in Pulpally-treated Primary Molars#915963
- Preformed Pediatric Crown Zirconia Versus Preformed Pediatric Metal Crown#903398
- 3D-printed Crowns Versus Prefabricated Stainless-Steel Crowns for Intermediate Restoration of Compromised First Permanent Molars#1369305
- Evaluating the Performance and Efficiency of Zirconia Crowns in Treating Primary Teeth#856423
Record · ID 1185007
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive