ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Digital Versus Conventional Impression CAD\CAM Constructed 4- Implant Supported Mandibular Overdenture Base
This clinical study was done to compare between digital with conventional impression used in the CAD/CAM constructed 4- implant supported mandibular overdenture base regarding their effect on the bone height changes
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Comparison of Three Final Impression Techniques for Severely Resorbed Mandibular Ridges#1137259
- Evaluation of the Impact of Integrating Dynamic Patient-Specific Motion and Implementing a Jaw Tracking System in the Attribution of the Occlusion in Full-Arch Restorations Through a Digital Workflow: A Clinical Study#839541
- Occlusion and Dis-Occlusion Time in Mandibular Overdentures Supported by Conventional Versus Mini- Dental Implants#806893
- Marginal Bone Loss Around Mandibular Implant-retaining Overdentures and Implant Supported Fixed Hybrid Prosthesis#343770
- Functional Relining Versus Digital Altered Cast Using Digitally Fabricated Distal Extension Frameworks#1371699
Record · ID 1185522
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive