arXiv (All)
open access
Who Guards the Benchmarks? Automated Auditing of LLM Agent Benchmarks
As benchmarks grow in complexity, many apparent agent failures are not failures of the agent at all---they are failures of the benchmark itself: broken specifications, implicit assumptions, and rigid evaluation scripts that penalize valid alternative approaches. We propose employing frontier LLMs as
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- When Agent Evaluation Becomes Unreliable: An Empirical Study of Oracle Failures and Configuration-Dependent Measurement in an LLM Agent Benchmark#1327657
- When Agent Evaluation Becomes Unreliable: An Empirical Study of Oracle Failures and Configuration-Dependent Measurement in an LLM Agent Benchmark#1319105
- VeriHarness: Scaling Agentic Verification for Long-Horizon Tasks#1155907
- ReproRepo: Scaling Reproducibility Audits with GitHub Repository Issues#820515
- Dream2Discern: Learning from Hard Latent Variants for Runtime Failure Prediction in Multi-Agent Systems#1327661
Record · ID 1186455
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive