arXiv (All)
open access
DAGR: State-Conditioned Goal Representations via Difference-Aware Goal Cross-Attention
Goal-conditioned reinforcement learning hinges on how the goal is encoded. Contrastive, metric, temporal-distance and information-theoretic encoders disagree on the objective. They agree on one thing. None of them sees the current state, so the embedding cannot mark which part of the goal still need
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- DAGR: State-Conditioned Goal Representations via Difference-Aware Goal Cross-Attention#370347
- Do Better Goal Representations Improve Goal-Conditioned Reinforcement Learning?#1145068
- Representation by Design in Generation: Cross-View Class-Token Alignment in Diffusion Transformers#1131190
- Direction-Conditioned Policies for Online Goal-Conditioned Reinforcement Learning#1201100
- Ventriloquist LLMs: Linear Alignment of Late-Stage Representations#1084161
Record · ID 1187488
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive