arXiv (All)
open access
Counterfactual Action Evaluation, Observation Bottlenecks, and Representation Geometry in Joint-Embedding Predictive World Models
Low latent prediction error does not establish that a world model distinguishes the consequences of its actions. We introduce an evaluation protocol that traces the same intervention through simulator state, raster observations, target embeddings, and predictor outputs. Exact simulator-state forks i
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- From World Models to World Action Models: Rethinking Next-State Prediction#1128685
- FACT: Failure-Aware Causal Training for World-Action Models#1344678
- LeWAM: End-to-End World and Action Modeling with JEPAs#1296825
- LPA-CWM: A Learned Physical Adjudicator for Motion Reasoning with Counterfactual World Models#1083549
- Beyond One-Step Accuracy: State-Affine Latent Transition for Reliable Visual Planning#1118307
Record · ID 1187538
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive