arXiv (All)
open access
Ask, Relax, or Act? Evaluating Actionable Indeterminacy in LLM Preference Reasoning
An LLM agent can recognize uncertainty yet still choose the wrong next step: asking when action is already justified, or seeking clarification when the constraints must change. We formalize actionable indeterminacy: act when an accepted action is shared across all admissible preferences or objective
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Skepticism motivated: on the skeptical import of motivated reasoning#708249
- When Reasons Run Out#103988
- Reasoning about Preference Models#464645
- In LLM Reasoning, there is Irrationality on top of Value Misalignment#800080
- Measuring Reasoning Quality in LLMs: A Multi-Dimensional Behavioral Framework#926044
Record · ID 1187780
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive