NCBI PubMed Central
open access
Guideline-augmented prompting improves comparative preference and response consistency of large language model outputs for orthopaedic anaesthesia questions: A controlled prompting study.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Clinician use of language models diverges from how the models are evaluated#1247996
- When Large Language Models Fail in Healthcare: Evaluating Sensitivity to Prompt Variations#266194
- Automating the triage of rheumatology outpatient referrals: a comparative evaluation of 23 large language models under simple and advanced prompting.#1299616
- Variation in Large Language Model Recommendations in Challenging Inpatient Management Scenarios.#25849
- Cost-Performance Evaluation of Large Language Models for Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis of HCAHPS Patient Comments: A Validation Study#361584
Record · ID 1189368
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive